UnderArmour писал(а):
Кто тебе сказал что отвратительное судейство в этом ПО является обязательно последствием внутренней коррупции лиги?
Если включить мозги, то любому человеку станет понятно, что тащить одну и ту же команду вторую серию подряд при РАЗНЫХ судьях в каждой игре может только лига, а не конкретный и заинтересованный судья. Указание сверху, где каждый судья на какой бы матч его не поставили выполняет приказ. Так и Донахи писал в своей книге.
UnderArmour писал(а):Вся твоя аргументация - обычная ватная конспирология.
Ты какол или заполитизированное быдлецо? Обычно только такие юзают этот термин и к делу и не к делу и в таком количестве, как это делаешь ты. Конспирология родилась задолго до этих самых ********. Когда-то тот факт, что каждый американец на прослушке у ЦРУ и АНБ тоже называли конспирологией, пока все не рассекретилось в один момент благодаря одному мужественному человеку. Так что.
UnderArmour писал(а):А где саму книгу почитать? Много звона слышал, ни разу не встречал.
http://www.amazon.com/Personal-Foul-Fir ... 061536263X по крайней мере я читал в бумажной форме. А англоязычном тырнете есть куча вырезок из книги, так можно и всю книгу частями насобирать. Этот как биография САФа, которую выкладывают частями, а целую книгу фиг скачаешь.
Relationships between NBA players and referees were generally all over the board — love, hate, and everything in-between. Some players, even very good ones, were targeted by referees and the league because they were too talented for their own good. Raja Bell, formerly of the Phoenix Suns and now a member of the Charlotte Bobcats, was one of those players. A defensive specialist throughout his career, Bell had a reputation for being a "star stopper." His defensive skills were so razor sharp that he could shut down a superstar, or at least make him work for his points. Kobe Bryant was often frustrated by Bell's tenacity on defense. Let's face it, no one completely shuts down a player of Kobe's caliber, but Bell could frustrate Kobe, take him out of his game, and interrupt his rhythm.
You would think that the NBA would love a guy who plays such great defense. Think again! Star stoppers hurt the promotion of marquee players. Fans don't pay high prices to see players like Raja Bell — they pay to see superstars like Kobe Bryant score 40 points. Basketball purists like to see good defense, but the NBA wants the big names to score big points.
If a player of Kobe's stature collides with the likes of Raja Bell, the call will almost always go for Kobe and against Bell. As part of our ongoing training and game preparation, NBA referees regularly receive game-action video tape from the league office. Over the years, I have reviewed many recorded hours of video involving Raja Bell. The footage I analyzed usually illustrated fouls being called against Bell, rarely for him. The message was subtle but clear — call fouls against the star stopper because he's hurting the game.
If Kobe Bryant had two fouls in the first or second quarter and went to the bench, one referee would tell the other two, "Kobe's got two fouls. Let's make sure that if we call a foul on him, it's an obvious foul, because otherwise he's gonna go back to the bench. If he is involved in a play where a foul is called, give the foul to another player."
Similarly, when games got physically rough, we would huddle up and agree to tighten the game up. So we started calling fouls on guys who didn't really matter — "ticky-tack" or "touch" fouls where one player just touched another but didn't really impede his progress. Under regular circumstances these wouldn't be fouls, but after a skirmish we wanted to regain control. We would never call these types of fouls on superstars, just on the average players who didn't have star status. It was important to keep the stars on the floor.
http://deadspin.com/5392067/excerpts-fr ... ou-to-read
"]
